ArXiv, one of the world’s most widely used repositories for scientific preprint research, has announced stricter measures against careless use of artificial intelligence in academic papers.

The move comes amid growing concerns over low quality submissions generated through large language models.

The platform, which plays a major role in distributing research in areas such as computer science and mathematics, has increasingly faced challenges linked to AI generated content.

Although papers uploaded to ArXiv are not peer reviewed before publication, the site remains a critical source of information for researchers worldwide.

As part of its latest policy, the chair of ArXiv’s computer science section, Thomas Dietterich, stated that papers containing clear evidence that authors failed to verify AI generated material could result in severe consequences. Examples include fabricated references, hallucinated citations, and visible AI generated comments mistakenly left within submitted manuscripts.

Under the updated rules, authors found violating the standards may face a one year ban from the platform. After the suspension period, future submissions will reportedly require prior acceptance by a reputable peer reviewed publication before they can appear on ArXiv.

The policy does not prohibit researchers from using AI tools entirely. Instead, the organization insists that authors remain fully responsible for every aspect of their work, regardless of whether the content was created manually or with assistance from artificial intelligence systems.

Recent studies have shown an increase in fabricated citations within scientific publications, particularly in biomedical research. Experts believe the misuse of AI tools is contributing to the problem, prompting research institutions and publishers to tighten standards aimed at preserving academic credibility and public trust in science.

Source: TechCrunch